when was the first nobel prize for economics awarded

uestion: Who was the first economist to win a Nobel Prize?

Many economists, hearing this question, would know that it's a trick question, but they would identify the small trick and miss the big one. The small trick is that there was no first economist to win the Nobel Prize in economics because two economists, Ragnar Frisch and Jan Tinbergen, shared it in 1969, when it was first awarded. If two people are chosen, how can one be first?

Now for the big trick: Although they were the first two economists to win the Nobel Prize in economics, another economist was actually the first to win the Nobel Prize. Frederic Passy, a French economist, shared the Nobel Peace Prize with Jean Henry Dunant in 1901. Indeed, they were the first recipients of the Nobel Peace Prize.

I point this out for two reasons. First, economists in the past have been some of the most prominent advocates of peace and opponents of silly wars. Second, it shows that the initial granters of the Peace Prize understood that it ought to go to people who did something for world peace.

Frederic Passy, who lived from 1822 to 1912, was an admirer of Richard Cobden, the famous British advocate of free trade and free markets and opponent of war and imperialism. In 1867, Passy, worried that France and Germany would go to war, spoke out against war and called instead for arbitration of disputes. The fact that France and Germany went to war in 1870 did not stop him: he was an advocate of peace for the rest of his life. According to Alfred Nobel's will, the prize was to be awarded " to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Thus it makes sense that the prize was awarded to Passy. It also makes sense that in 1970 it was awarded to Norman Borlaug, whose "Green Revolution" fed literally hundreds of millions of poor people, saving that many lives, in Asia and Mexico.

But many of the people on the list of past Nobel Peace Prize recipients are, to put it mildly, suspect. The list of suspects starts early. Theodore Roosevelt won the award in 1906 for helping end the Russo-Japanese War. Woodrow Wilson won the award in 1919 for promoting the League of Nations. Henry Kissinger and Le Duc Tho won the award in 1973 for the Vietnam Peace Accord, although Le Duc Tho refused the award on the grounds that there was no peace in Vietnam. Menachem Begin and Anwar al-Sadat won the award in 1978 for negotiating peace between Egypt and Israel.

That's just a sampling of the strange awards. Why strange? Because, though they received the Nobel Peace Prize, everyone on the list was incredibly warlike, imperialistic, or brutal, or all three. Theodore Roosevelt was one of the first U.S. presidents to make the U.S. into an imperialist power that, ever since, has gone around the world sticking its nose � and its arms � into other people's business. Indeed, as Reason managing editor Jesse Walker pointed out, Roosevelt described the Spanish-American war as "fun." Woodrow Wilson got the U.S. into World War I when there was no good reason for doing so. His doing so made the German government realize it could never win the war, leading the Germans to surrender. This led to the Versailles Treaty, whose terms were tilted heavily against Germany despite Wilson's assurance to the German government, before it surrendered, that this would not happen. The Versailles Treaty, in turn, upset Germans so much that some of them, who probably never would otherwise have done so, supported Hitler or at least acquiesced in his brutal moves, both domestic and international. For that reason, Wilson arguably did more to create war in the 20th century than any other American. Henry Kissinger, while working for Richard Nixon, had a large role in the decision to bomb the bejesus out of North Vietnam and the decision to bomb Cambodia. Le Duc Tho defended North Vietnam but also attacked South Vietnam. Menachem Begin was an Israeli terrorist who later became president of Israel and invaded Lebanon. Anwar al-Sadat started the Yom Kippur war, an attack on Israel, in 1973.

The moral seems to be, as Jesse Walker noted, that if you want to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, first kill a lot of people and then stop. And don't think that the candidates waiting in the wings for the prize haven't noticed this.

It's quite understandable why this happened. Imagine you're sitting in Sweden and you're on the committee trying to choose the winner. You really do want peace. You notice that some of the most brutal people in the world have stopped being brutal and are suing for peace. You want to encourage that. And so you argue for giving them the prize. That seems like a reasonable incentive. The problem is that when people understand the incentives, they also understand that to get into the position of stopping killing people, they have to kill people first. The solution here would be for the Nobel committee to swear publicly that they will never again give the prize to anyone who got his country into anything other than strictly a war of self-defense. They should probably go further and say that they would never give the prize to anyone involved in war. Even wars of self-defense don't always have to be fought � some situations, as Passy noted, can be negotiated.

For these reasons, I'm not as upset as many people are that the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize went to Al Gore. I don't think he deserved it, for two reasons. The first is on the issue of global warming itself. Although Gore professes certainty about global warming, he first accepted an invitation to be interviewed along with Bjorn Lomborg, a skeptic about the importance of global warming, and then, with little notice, turned down the invite. If he prevails in the policies he advocates on global warming, and if he's wrong about the global warming problem, he will have succeeded in making the whole world substantially poorer � and possibly, therefore, less peaceful. Second, as vice president under Bill Clinton, Gore went along with Clinton's unprovoked attacks on nations in the Balkans. I don't recall hearing a peep out of him about that. Still, though, Gore's record is not as bad as Theodore Roosevelt's or Woodrow Wilson's.

Fortunately, one of this year's Nobel Prize winners has made some sensible, pro-peace statements, and he's done it using the economic way of thinking. That person is Roger B. Myerson, who won one third of the prize for economics. One thing that distinguishes most economists from non-economists is that they focus on the importance of incentives in driving human behavior. As I wrote in my book, The Joy of Freedom: An Economist's Odyssey, I noticed early in my study of economics that in almost all the economics I read, incentives were key to understanding behavior. That's why I made it one of my "Ten Pillars of Economic Wisdom." Myerson is no exception. In his analysis of an ominous trend he saw in the Bush administration, Myerson noted the incentives that Bush was creating in the rest of the world, incentives that could come back and bite us. In a Feb. 17, 2003, op-ed [.pdf] in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, written while President Bush was planning to invade Iraq, Myerson criticized Bush's way of thinking about war. One of his best paragraphs is the following:

"When American forces invade one country after another, people everywhere must ask what keeps them from becoming another American target. In countries where there is no clear answer to this question, politicians will seek military deterrents against America, because people everywhere demand leaders who can promise security."

Myerson ends his op-ed as follows:

"Our government's policy of denying any need for foreign approval of American military actions may seem bold and effective now, but in the long run it can incite deadly rivalries to haunt our future. From a simplistic viewpoint, it might seem paradoxical that a country with overwhelming military superiority can become more secure by accepting some constraints from the international community, to reassure its neighbors. Bismark [sic] understood this fact well, but Kaiser Wilhelm II ignored it disastrously at the turn of the twentieth century. For the safety of our civilization in the twenty-first century, American statesmen need to understand it now."

Those two paragraphs are more important for world peace than anything Al Gore has ever done.

Economists and the Nobel Peace PrizeAntiwar.com, USA
- Oct 22, 2007
- Oct 22, 2007
The small trick is that there was no first economist to win the Nobel Prize in economics because two economists, Ragnar Frisch and Jan Tinbergen, ...
clipped from Google - 10/2007
A Nobel LessonThe Moscow Times
- Oct 23, 2007
- Oct 23, 2007
By Konstantin Sonin In mid-October, there is only one suitable theme for a column on economics -- the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science. ...
clipped from Google - 10/2007
FM'S SPEECH AT THE NORWEGIAN NOBEL INSTITUTE, OSLOPress Information Bureau (press release), India
- Oct 24, 2007
- 5 hours ago
Over the years, by the award of the Nobel Prize, you have encouraged individuals and organizations to work for the cause of peace and international ...
clipped from Google - 10/2007
Three Americans Share Nobel Economics AwardVoice of America
- Oct 16, 2007
- Oct 16, 2007
The economics award was not included in the will left by Alfred Nobel upon his death in 1897, but was funded in 1968 by the National Bank of Sweden. ...
clipped from Google - 10/2007
More news results ?

Blog posts


When Was The First Nobel Prize For Economics Awarded 49 minutes ago
When was the first Nobel Prize for economics awarded? or Who was the first economist to win a Nobel Prize?, seems to be the question everyone seems to be asking today!

Too Many Black Swans? 14 hours ago
The prize was created (and funded) by the Swedish central bank and has been progressively confused with the regular Nobel set up by Alfred Nobel; it is now mislabelled the "
15 Award-Winning Facts About The Nobel Prize Oct 16, 2007
Robert Lucas, winner of the 1995 Nobel Prize in Economics for his work on the theory of "rational expectations," split his $1 million prize with his ex-wife. If there were a Nobel Prize for Foresight or Timing, I'd nominate her, ...


Web results


The Prize in Economics 2005 - Press Release
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, 2005, jointly to ...

A prize in economics in memory of Nobel ("The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic .... Since the first Nobel Prize was awarded in 1901, the proceedings, ...


The New York Times > Business > 2 Mavericks in Economics Awarded ...
An American and a Norwegian won the Nobel prize in economics for research into how new ... making him the first Nobel laureate employed by the Fed. ...

clipped from Google - 10/2007
Yunus wins Nobel Peace Prize - International Business - MSNBC.com
Yunus is the first Nobel Prize winner from Bangladesh, ... a mother of three when the economics professor met her in 1974 and asked her how much she earned. ...
uestion: Who was the first economist to win a Nobel Prize?

Many economists, hearing this question, would know that it's a trick question, but they would identify the small trick and miss the big one. The small trick is that there was no first economist to win the Nobel Prize in economics because two economists, Ragnar Frisch and Jan Tinbergen, shared it in 1969, when it was first awarded. If two people are chosen, how can one be first?

Now for the big trick: Although they were the first two economists to win the Nobel Prize in economics, another economist was actually the first to win the Nobel Prize. Frederic Passy, a French economist, shared the Nobel Peace Prize with Jean Henry Dunant in 1901. Indeed, they were the first recipients of the Nobel Peace Prize.

I point this out for two reasons. First, economists in the past have been some of the most prominent advocates of peace and opponents of silly wars. Second, it shows that the initial granters of the Peace Prize understood that it ought to go to people who did something for world peace.

Frederic Passy, who lived from 1822 to 1912, was an admirer of Richard Cobden, the famous British advocate of free trade and free markets and opponent of war and imperialism. In 1867, Passy, worried that France and Germany would go to war, spoke out against war and called instead for arbitration of disputes. The fact that France and Germany went to war in 1870 did not stop him: he was an advocate of peace for the rest of his life. According to Alfred Nobel's will, the prize was to be awarded " to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Thus it makes sense that the prize was awarded to Passy. It also makes sense that in 1970 it was awarded to Norman Borlaug, whose "Green Revolution" fed literally hundreds of millions of poor people, saving that many lives, in Asia and Mexico.

But many of the people on the list of past Nobel Peace Prize recipients are, to put it mildly, suspect. The list of suspects starts early. Theodore Roosevelt won the award in 1906 for helping end the Russo-Japanese War. Woodrow Wilson won the award in 1919 for promoting the League of Nations. Henry Kissinger and Le Duc Tho won the award in 1973 for the Vietnam Peace Accord, although Le Duc Tho refused the award on the grounds that there was no peace in Vietnam. Menachem Begin and Anwar al-Sadat won the award in 1978 for negotiating peace between Egypt and Israel.

That's just a sampling of the strange awards. Why strange? Because, though they received the Nobel Peace Prize, everyone on the list was incredibly warlike, imperialistic, or brutal, or all three. Theodore Roosevelt was one of the first U.S. presidents to make the U.S. into an imperialist power that, ever since, has gone around the world sticking its nose � and its arms � into other people's business. Indeed, as Reason managing editor Jesse Walker pointed out, Roosevelt described the Spanish-American war as "fun." Woodrow Wilson got the U.S. into World War I when there was no good reason for doing so. His doing so made the German government realize it could never win the war, leading the Germans to surrender. This led to the Versailles Treaty, whose terms were tilted heavily against Germany despite Wilson's assurance to the German government, before it surrendered, that this would not happen. The Versailles Treaty, in turn, upset Germans so much that some of them, who probably never would otherwise have done so, supported Hitler or at least acquiesced in his brutal moves, both domestic and international. For that reason, Wilson arguably did more to create war in the 20th century than any other American. Henry Kissinger, while working for Richard Nixon, had a large role in the decision to bomb the bejesus out of North Vietnam and the decision to bomb Cambodia. Le Duc Tho defended North Vietnam but also attacked South Vietnam. Menachem Begin was an Israeli terrorist who later became president of Israel and invaded Lebanon. Anwar al-Sadat started the Yom Kippur war, an attack on Israel, in 1973.

The moral seems to be, as Jesse Walker noted, that if you want to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, first kill a lot of people and then stop. And don't think that the candidates waiting in the wings for the prize haven't noticed this.

It's quite understandable why this happened. Imagine you're sitting in Sweden and you're on the committee trying to choose the winner. You really do want peace. You notice that some of the most brutal people in the world have stopped being brutal and are suing for peace. You want to encourage that. And so you argue for giving them the prize. That seems like a reasonable incentive. The problem is that when people understand the incentives, they also understand that to get into the position of stopping killing people, they have to kill people first. The solution here would be for the Nobel committee to swear publicly that they will never again give the prize to anyone who got his country into anything other than strictly a war of self-defense. They should probably go further and say that they would never give the prize to anyone involved in war. Even wars of self-defense don't always have to be fought � some situations, as Passy noted, can be negotiated.

For these reasons, I'm not as upset as many people are that the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize went to Al Gore. I don't think he deserved it, for two reasons. The first is on the issue of global warming itself. Although Gore professes certainty about global warming, he first accepted an invitation to be interviewed along with Bjorn Lomborg, a skeptic about the importance of global warming, and then, with little notice, turned down the invite. If he prevails in the policies he advocates on global warming, and if he's wrong about the global warming problem, he will have succeeded in making the whole world substantially poorer � and possibly, therefore, less peaceful. Second, as vice president under Bill Clinton, Gore went along with Clinton's unprovoked attacks on nations in the Balkans. I don't recall hearing a peep out of him about that. Still, though, Gore's record is not as bad as Theodore Roosevelt's or Woodrow Wilson's.

Fortunately, one of this year's Nobel Prize winners has made some sensible, pro-peace statements, and he's done it using the economic way of thinking. That person is Roger B. Myerson, who won one third of the prize for economics. One thing that distinguishes most economists from non-economists is that they focus on the importance of incentives in driving human behavior. As I wrote in my book, The Joy of Freedom: An Economist's Odyssey, I noticed early in my study of economics that in almost all the economics I read, incentives were key to understanding behavior. That's why I made it one of my "Ten Pillars of Economic Wisdom." Myerson is no exception. In his analysis of an ominous trend he saw in the Bush administration, Myerson noted the incentives that Bush was creating in the rest of the world, incentives that could come back and bite us. In a Feb. 17, 2003, op-ed [.pdf] in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, written while President Bush was planning to invade Iraq, Myerson criticized Bush's way of thinking about war. One of his best paragraphs is the following:

"When American forces invade one country after another, people everywhere must ask what keeps them from becoming another American target. In countries where there is no clear answer to this question, politicians will seek military deterrents against America, because people everywhere demand leaders who can promise security."

Myerson ends his op-ed as follows:

"Our government's policy of denying any need for foreign approval of American military actions may seem bold and effective now, but in the long run it can incite deadly rivalries to haunt our future. From a simplistic viewpoint, it might seem paradoxical that a country with overwhelming military superiority can become more secure by accepting some constraints from the international community, to reassure its neighbors. Bismark [sic] understood this fact well, but Kaiser Wilhelm II ignored it disastrously at the turn of the twentieth century. For the safety of our civilization in the twenty-first century, American statesmen need to understand it now."

Those two paragraphs are more important for world peace than anything Al Gore has ever done.
Nobel Prize
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is currently protected from editing until disputes have been resolved.
Protection is not an endorsement of the current version (protection log). Please discuss changes on the talk page or request unprotection. You may use {{editprotected}} on the talk page to ask for an administrator to make an edit for you.
Nobel Prize


Awarded for Outstanding contributions in physics, chemistry, literature, peace, and physiology or medicine. The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel is awarded by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
Presented by Swedish Academy
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Karolinska Institutet
Norwegian Nobel Committee
Country Sweden
First awarded 1901
Official website
The Nobel Prize (Swedish: Nobelpriset), as designated in Alfred Nobel's will in 1895, is awarded for physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, literature, and peace. A prize in economics in memory of Nobel ("The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel") was instituted by Sweden's central bank in 1968. The five initial prizes were first awarded in 1901, while the first prize in economics was awarded in 1969. The prizes in specific fields of research are widely regarded as the most prestigious award one can receive in those fields. The Nobel Peace Prize conveys social prestige, and that award also is often politically controversial. With the exception of the Nobel Peace Prize, the Nobel Prizes are presented in Stockholm at a formal annual ceremony on December 10, the anniversary of Nobel's death. The Nobel Peace Prize and its recipients' lectures are presented at a formal annual ceremony in Oslo, Norway, also on December 10; the lectures by the recipients of the Prizes awarded in Stockholm occur in the days prior to December 10.[1] "Since the Nobel Prize is regarded by far as the most prestigious prize in the world, the Award Ceremonies as well as the Banquets in Stockholm and Oslo on 10 December have been transformed from local Swedish and Norwegian arrangements into major international events that receive worldwide coverage by the print media, radio and television."[2]

Contents
1 Alfred Nobel's will
2 Nomination and selection
2.1 Recognition time lag
3 Award ceremonies
4 Controversies and criticisms
4.1 Overlooked achievements
4.2 Mathematics prize
4.3 Engineering and Applied Science
5 Uniquely distinguished laureates
5.1 Multiple laureates
5.2 Family laureates
5.3 Age extremes
6 See also
7 Notes
8 External links



Alfred Nobel's will

Alfred Nobel.The five initial Prizes were instituted by the final will of Alfred Nobel, a Swedish chemist and industrialist, who was the inventor of the high explosive dynamite. Though Nobel wrote several wills during his lifetime, the last was written a little over a year before he died, and signed at the Swedish-Norwegian Club in Paris on November 27, 1895. Nobel's work had directly involved the creation of explosives, and he became increasingly uneasy with the military use of his inventions. It is said that this was motivated in part by his reading of a premature obituary of himself, published in error by a French newspaper on the occasion of the death of Nobel's brother Ludvig, and which condemned Nobel as a "merchant of death."[3] Nobel bequeathed 94% of his total assets, 31 million Swedish Kroner, for the establishment of five prizes.

" The whole of my remaining realizable estate shall be dealt with in the following way:

The capital shall be invested by my executors in safe securities and shall constitute a fund, the interest on which shall be annually distributed in the form of prizes to those who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind. The said interest shall be divided into five equal parts, which shall be apportioned as follows: one part to the person who shall have made the most important discovery or invention within the field of physics; one part to the person who shall have made the most important chemical discovery or improvement; one part to the person who shall have made the most important discovery within the domain of physiology or medicine; one part to the person who shall have produced in the field of literature the most outstanding work of an idealistic tendency; and one part to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity among nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.

The prizes for physics and chemistry shall be awarded by the Swedish Academy of Sciences; that for physiological or medical works by the Caroline Institute in Stockholm; that for literature by the Academy in Stockholm; and that for champions of peace by a committee of five persons to be elected by the Norwegian Storting. It is my express wish that in awarding the prizes no consideration whatever shall be given to the nationality of the candidates, so that the most worthy shall receive the prize, whether he be Scandinavian or not.
"

Although Nobel's will established the prizes, his plan was incomplete and, due to various other hurdles, it took five years before the Nobel Foundation could be established and the first prizes awarded on December 10, 1901.[5]


Nomination and selection
Compared with some other prizes, the Prize nomination and selection process is long and rigorous. This is a key reason why the Prizes have grown in importance over the years to become the most important prizes in their field.[6]

The Nobel Laureates are selected by their respective committees. For the Prizes in Chemistry, Physics and Economics, a committee consists of five members elected by The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences; for the Prize in Literature, a committee of four to five members of the Swedish Academy; for the Prize in Physiology or Medicine, the committee consists of five members selected by The Nobel Assembly, which consists of 50 members elected by Karolinska Institutet; for the Peace Prize, the Norwegian Nobel Committee consists of five members elected by the Norwegian Storting (the Norwegian parliament).[7] In its first stage, several thousand people are asked to nominate candidates. These names are scrutinized and discussed by experts in their specific disciplines until only the winners remain. This slow and thorough process, insisted upon by Alfred Nobel, is arguably what gives the prize its importance. Despite this, there have been questionable awards and questionable omissions over the prize's century-long history.

Forms, which amount to a personal and exclusive invitation, are sent to about three thousand selected individuals to invite them to submit nominations. For the peace prize, inquiries are sent to such people as governments of states, members of international courts, professors and rectors at university level, former Peace Prize laureates, current or former members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, among others. The Norwegian Nobel Committee then bases its assessment on nominations sent in before 3rd of February.[8] The submission deadline for nominations for Physics, Chemistry, Medicine, Literature and Economics is January 31.[9] Self-nominations and nominations of deceased people are disqualified.

The names of the nominees are never publicly announced, and neither are they told that they have been considered for the Prize. Nomination records are sealed for fifty years. In practice some nominees do become known. It is also common for publicists to make such a claim, founded or not.

After the deadline has passed, the nominations are screened by committee, and a list is produced of approximately two hundred preliminary candidates. This list is forwarded to selected experts in the relevant field. They remove all but approximately fifteen names. The committee submits a report with recommendations to the appropriate institution. The Assembly for the Medicine Prize, for example, has fifty members. The institution members then select prize winners by vote.

The selection process varies slightly between the different disciplines. The Literature Prize is rarely awarded to more than one person per year, whereas other Prizes now often involve collaborators of two or three.

While posthumous nominations are not permitted, awards can occur if the individual died in the months between the nomination and the decision of the prize committee. The scenario has occurred twice: The 1931 Literature Prize of Erik Axel Karlfeldt, and the 1961 Peace Prize to UN Secretary General Dag Hammarskj?ld. As of 1974, laureates must be alive at the time of the October announcement. There has been one laureate―William Vickrey (1996, Economics)―who died after the prize was announced but before it could be presented.


Recognition time lag
The interval between the accomplishment of the achievement being recognized and the awarding of the Nobel Prize for it varies from discipline to discipline. Prizes in Literature are typically awarded to recognize a cumulative lifetime body of work rather than a single achievement. In this case the notion of "lag" does not directly apply. Prizes in Peace, on the other hand, are often awarded within a few years of the events they recognize. For instance, Kofi Annan was awarded the 2001 Peace Prize just four years after becoming the Secretary-General of the UN.

Awards in the scientific disciplines of physics and chemistry require that the significance of achievements being recognized is "tested by time." In practice it means that the lag between the discovery and the award is typically on the order of 20 years and can be much longer. For example, 1/2 of the 1983 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar for his work on stellar structure and evolution that was done during the 1930s. As a downside of this approach, not all scientists live long enough for their work to be recognized. Some important scientific discoveries are never considered for a Prize, as the discoverers may have died by the time the impact of their work is realized.


Award ceremonies
The committees and institutions serving as the selection boards for the prizes typically announce the names of the laureates in October. The prizes are then awarded at formal ceremonies held annually on December 10, the anniversary of Alfred Nobel's death. In recent years the Nobel Banquet has been held in Stockholm City Hall in connection with the Nobel Prizes in the various disciplines. In 2005 and 2006, these Prize ceremonies were held at the Stockholm Concert Hall, with the Banquet following immediately in the Blue Hall of the Stockholm City Hall. Previously, the Nobel Prizes ceremony was held in a ballroom in Stockholm's Grand Hotel.

The Nobel Peace Prize ceremony has been held at the Norwegian Nobel Institute (1905-1946); at the Aula of the University of Oslo (1947-1990); and most recently at the Oslo City Hall.

A maximum of three laureates and two different works may be selected per award. Each award can be given to a maximum of three recipients per year. Each consists of a gold medal, a diploma, and a cash grant. The grant is currently approximately 10 million SEK, slightly more than � million (US$1.5 million). The original purpose of the grant was to fund laureates' further work, although nowadays many are retired at the time of award.[citation needed] This has led to some criticism that the prize is not in accordance with Alfred Nobel's intentions.[attribution needed]

If there are two winners in a particular category, the award grant is divided equally amongst the recipients. If there are three, the awarding committee has the option of dividing the grant equally, or awarding one-half to one recipient, and one-quarter to each of the others. It is not uncommon for recipients to donate prize money to benefit scientific, cultural or humanitarian causes.

Since 1902, the King of Sweden has, with the exception of the Peace Prize, presented all the prizes in Stockholm. At first King Oscar II did not approve of awarding grand prizes to foreigners, but is said to have changed his mind once his attention had been drawn to the publicity value of the prizes for Sweden.

Until the Norwegian Nobel Committee was established in 1904, the President of Norwegian Parliament made the formal presentation of the Nobel Peace Prize. The Committee's five members are entrusted with researching and adjudicating the Prize as well as awarding it. Although appointed by the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget), they are independent and answer to no legislative authority. Members of the Norwegian government are not permitted to sit on the Committee.


Controversies and criticisms
Main article: Nobel Prize controversies
Main article: Nobel Prize in Literature#Controversies
Since the first Nobel Prize was awarded in 1901, the proceedings, nominations, awardees and exclusions have generated criticism and engendered much controversy.


Overlooked achievements
Mahatma Gandhi was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize five times between 1937 and 1948 but never received the prize before being assassinated on 30 January 1948, two days before the closing date for the 1948 Peace Prize nominations. The Norwegian Nobel Committee had very likely planned to give him the Peace Prize in 1948 as they considered a posthumous award, but ultimately decided against it and instead chose not to award the prize that year.[10]

The strict rules against a prize being awarded to more than three people at once is also a cause for controversy. Where a prize is awarded to recognise an achievement by a team of more than three collaborators, inevitably one or more will miss out. For example, in 2002, a Prize was awarded to Koichi Tanaka and John Fenn for the development of mass spectrometry in protein chemistry, an award that failed to recognise the achievements of Franz Hillenkamp and Michael Karas of the Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry at the University of Frankfurt.[11]

Similarly, the prohibition of posthumous awards fails to recognise achievements by a collaborator who happens to die before the prize is awarded. Rosalind Franklin, who was key in the discovery of the structure of DNA in 1953, died of ovarian cancer in 1958, four years before Francis Crick, James D. Watson and Maurice Wilkins (one of Franklin's collaborators) were awarded the Prize for Medicine or Physiology in 1962.[12] Franklin's significant and relevant contribution was only briefly mentioned in Crick and Watson's Nobel Prize-winning paper: "We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr. M.H.F. Wilkins, Dr. R.E. Franklin, and co-workers..."[13]

In some cases, awards have arguably omitted similar discoveries made earlier. For example, the 2000 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for "the discovery and development of conductive organic polymers" (1977) ignored the much earlier discovery of highly-conductive charge transfer complex polymers: the 1963 series of papers by Weiss, et al. reported even higher conductivity in similarly iodine-doped oxidized polypyrrole.[14][15]


Mathematics prize
There are several possible reasons why Nobel did not create a prize for mathematics. Nobel's will speaks of prizes for those inventions or discoveries of greatest practical benefit to mankind, possibly having in mind practical rather than theoretical works. Because mathematics is not considered as practical a science as the others that are recognized, this would explain the lack of a mathematics prize.[16]

Another possible reason is that there was already a well-known Scandinavian prize for mathematicians. The existing mathematical awards at the time were mainly due to the work of G?sta Mittag-Leffler, who founded the Acta Mathematica, a century later still one of the world's leading mathematical journals. Through his influence in Stockholm he persuaded King Oscar II to endow prize competitions and honor distinguished mathematicians all over Europe, including Hermite, Bertrand, Weierstrass, and Poincaré.

There is an urban legend that Nobel refused to endow a mathematics prize after his wife had an affair with the mathematician Mittag-Leffler. This story is false as Alfred Nobel never actually married.[17]

However, some mathematicians have won the Nobel Prize in other fields: Bertrand Russell for literature (1950), Max Born and Walther Bothe for physics (1954). Still others have won the related Nobel Memorial prize in Economics: Kenneth Arrow (1972), Leonid Kantorovich (1975), John Forbes Nash (1994), Clive W. J. Granger (2003), Robert J. Aumann and Thomas C. Schelling (2005), Leonid Hurwicz (2007) [18]

Several prizes in mathematics have similarities to the Nobel Prize. The Fields Medal is often described as the Nobel Prize of mathematics, but it differs in being awarded only once every four years to people younger than forty years old. A comparison may be made with the Crafoord Prize, awarded by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences since 1982. Other comparable prizes are the Abel Prize, awarded by the Norwegian government as of 2001; the Shaw Prize in mathematical sciences given since 2004; and the Gauss Prize, first introduced by the International Mathematical Union and the Deutsche Mathematiker-Vereinigung at the 2006 International Congress of Mathematicians for practical and applied mathematics research. The Clay Mathematics Institute has set up seven "Millennium Problems" [19], the solving of which results in a significant cash award. This prize differs from the Nobel in that it has a clear, predetermined objective for its award, and these prizes can be awarded whenever a problem is solved.


Engineering and Applied Science
Some Nobel Prizes have been awarded for applied rather than basic scientific discoveries. However, some significant engineering discoveries don't really fit into the major categories in which Nobel Prizes are awarded. One of the more prominent awards given in engineering is the Draper Prize.


Uniquely distinguished laureates

Multiple laureates
Since the establishment of the Nobel Prize, four people have received two Nobel Prizes:[20]

Maria Sk?odowska-Curie: in Physics 1903, for the discovery of radioactivity; and in Chemistry 1911, for the isolation of pure radium
Linus Pauling: in Chemistry 1954, for the hybridized orbital theory; and Peace 1962, for nuclear test-ban treaty activism;
John Bardeen: in Physics 1956, for the invention of the transistor; and Physics 1972, for the theory of superconductivity; and
Frederick Sanger: in Chemistry 1958, for structure of the insulin molecule; and in Chemistry 1980, for virus nucleotide sequencing.
Otto Heinrich Warburg could have been among them, but he was prevented by the Nazi government from accepting his second Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1944.[21]

As a group, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has received the Nobel Peace Prize three times: in 1917, 1944, and 1963. The first two prizes were specifically in recognition of the group's work during the world wars. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has won the Peace Prize twice: in 1954 and 1981.


Family laureates
A number of families have included multiple laureates.[20] The Curie family claim the most Nobel Prizes, with five:

Maria Sk?odowska-Curie, Physics 1903 and Chemistry 1911
Her husband Pierre Curie, Physics 1903
Their daughter Irène Joliot-Curie, Chemistry 1935
Their son in law Frederic Joliot-Curie, Chemistry 1935
Furthermore, Henry Labouisse, the husband of the Curies' second daughter ève, was the director of UNICEF when it won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1965.


Age extremes
William Lawrence Bragg, who was only 25 when he shared the 1915 Nobel Prize in Physics with his father William Henry Bragg, is the youngest person ever to win a Nobel Prize.[22] Doris Lessing, 87, is the oldest woman ever to win a Nobel Prize when she was awarded the 2007 Nobel Prize in Literature. [23]


See also
Nobel Library
Nobel Museum
Nobel Peace Center
List of prizes, medals, and awards
List of Nobel laureates
Nobel laureates by country
Nobel laureates by university affiliation
Female Nobel Prize laureates
Nobel Prize controversies
Alternative Nobel Prize